Practical engineering. Texas roots.
(832) 848-0319Client Portal ↗

Business technology / Built for the work

SOC 2

Build confidence in how your business protects information and operates its services. Killer Logic helps you prepare for a SOC 2 examination, put practical controls into daily use and maintain the evidence your program needs over time.

Talk to an Engineer ↗

Recognize the friction?

When trust depends on controls you can demonstrate

  • Customers ask for a SOC 2 report before your team has a clear view of readiness or system boundaries.
  • Policies exist, but access reviews, change approvals and other routines are inconsistent.
  • Evidence is scattered across systems and does not clearly show when controls operated.
  • Walkthroughs and audit requests pull owners away from work without clear priorities.
  • The program loses momentum between reporting periods as people, vendors and systems change.

What we work on

A SOC 2 program built into daily operations

How do we demonstrate that the systems supporting our services are controlled and trustworthy? We help define your system, put controls into use and organize the evidence that explains their operation. Killer Logic supports readiness and ongoing program operation; an independent licensed CPA firm performs the examination and issues the SOC report. As your advocate, we help management and control owners navigate requests, explain their work accurately and follow issues through to action.

Scope, criteria and readiness

Identify the services, systems, people and dependencies supporting your commitments. SOC 2 uses the Trust Services Criteria, with categories for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy. Help select applicable categories based on your system, commitments and examination needs; every engagement does not automatically cover all five. Map existing controls to the relevant criteria and identify readiness gaps.

Risk, policies and operating controls

Connect risk assessment to policies and procedures people can follow. Establish access management, onboarding and offboarding, periodic access reviews and change approvals with clear ownership. Address vendor oversight and incident preparedness, and recovery or availability planning where relevant. Turn remediation priorities into operating routines with records that show who performed and reviewed the work.

Evidence throughout the reporting period

Create an evidence calendar and index linking controls to records, owners and collection dates. Review completeness, reconcile missing periods and help explain exceptions. Documentation alone does not demonstrate sustained control operation: the program needs records of activities actually performed. Work with existing tools where useful, while checking that collected evidence reflects the system and control being described.

Examination preparation and advocacy

Support management’s system description and prepare control owners for walkthroughs. Translate auditor requests into understandable tasks and coordinate progress. Help accurately explain how controls work and clarify requests that appear mismatched to system boundaries or the agreed scope. Keep unresolved issues visible, with factual responses that support the auditor’s independent evaluation rather than attempting to direct its conclusions.

Corrective action and continued improvement

Help management respond to exceptions, understand causes and assign corrective actions. Follow up on whether revised controls are operating, update documentation after changes and maintain recurring review responsibilities. Keep the program functioning after examination through evidence checks, owner support and periodic reassessment of risks, vendors and service commitments.

Example Projects

A software provider preparing for its first examination

For a software provider responding to customer assurance requests, define the service boundary and relevant categories, assess access and change practices, and build an evidence calendar. Help control owners close gaps and explain the operating routines they will need to sustain.

An established program between reporting periods

For a company maintaining its SOC 2 program, review changes to vendors, infrastructure and responsibilities. Check evidence completeness, update policies and the system description, and follow exceptions through corrective action while preparing the next period’s examination requests.

How we engage

Establish controls, demonstrate operation and keep improving

  1. Define system boundaries, service commitments and applicable categories, then assess readiness with management and control owners.
  2. Prioritize gaps, implement practical policies and controls, and agree who operates, reviews and records each activity.
  3. Maintain evidence routines and readiness checks, support the system description and prepare owners for examination walkthroughs.
  4. Coordinate audit requests and management responses, then track corrective actions and sustain the program between reporting periods.

What you take forward

Practical deliverables.

  • A readiness assessment and criteria/control mapping tied to the system and its commitments.
  • A practical policy and procedure set with control owners and operating responsibilities.
  • A remediation backlog with priorities, dependencies and corrective-action tracking.
  • An evidence calendar and index with completeness checks and follow-up responsibilities.
  • Management system-description support and an examination coordination tracker.

Before we get started

Questions worth asking.

How is SOC 2 different from SOC 1?

SOC 2 addresses controls using applicable Trust Services Criteria; SOC 1 focuses on controls relevant to customers’ financial reporting. SOC means System and Organization Controls in these services. It does not refer to a security operations center or establish a managed detection or round-the-clock response capability.

Should we prepare for Type 1 or Type 2?

Type 1 addresses the system description and suitability of control design at a specified date. Type 2 also addresses operating effectiveness over a specified period. The right choice depends on customer needs and program maturity; Type 1 is not mandatory before Type 2. Readiness checks help you prepare and are separate from the independent examination.

Do we need all five categories?

No. Security is foundational; additional categories depend on your service commitments, system and examination needs. For example, availability commitments may make recovery and capacity practices particularly relevant. We help management discuss the appropriate scope with its auditor before building an unnecessarily broad program.

Can you use our existing compliance software and auditor?

Yes. We organize the program around your business and work with your selected tools and CPA firm. Software can help gather records and track tasks, but control owners still need to perform the work, review exceptions and explain what the evidence demonstrates.

Can you provide ongoing support after the report?

Yes. We help maintain an effective program through recurring control schedules, evidence review, owner support and corrective-action tracking. As systems and commitments change, we revisit scope and documentation so the next reporting period reflects how the business actually operates.

Connected services

When the next step connects.

SOC 1

Prepare for a SOC 1 examination and maintain the controls your customers rely on for financial reporting.

Explore SOC 1

Explore related planning resources ↗

A useful next conversation

Build a SOC 2 program your team can sustain.

Share your customer requirements, current controls and examination plans. We can help turn readiness work into a practical ongoing program.