How do we demonstrate that the systems supporting our services are controlled and trustworthy? We help define your system, put controls into use and organize the evidence that explains their operation. Killer Logic supports readiness and ongoing program operation; an independent licensed CPA firm performs the examination and issues the SOC report. As your advocate, we help management and control owners navigate requests, explain their work accurately and follow issues through to action.
Scope, criteria and readiness
Identify the services, systems, people and dependencies supporting your commitments. SOC 2 uses the Trust Services Criteria, with categories for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy. Help select applicable categories based on your system, commitments and examination needs; every engagement does not automatically cover all five. Map existing controls to the relevant criteria and identify readiness gaps.
Risk, policies and operating controls
Connect risk assessment to policies and procedures people can follow. Establish access management, onboarding and offboarding, periodic access reviews and change approvals with clear ownership. Address vendor oversight and incident preparedness, and recovery or availability planning where relevant. Turn remediation priorities into operating routines with records that show who performed and reviewed the work.
Evidence throughout the reporting period
Create an evidence calendar and index linking controls to records, owners and collection dates. Review completeness, reconcile missing periods and help explain exceptions. Documentation alone does not demonstrate sustained control operation: the program needs records of activities actually performed. Work with existing tools where useful, while checking that collected evidence reflects the system and control being described.
Examination preparation and advocacy
Support management’s system description and prepare control owners for walkthroughs. Translate auditor requests into understandable tasks and coordinate progress. Help accurately explain how controls work and clarify requests that appear mismatched to system boundaries or the agreed scope. Keep unresolved issues visible, with factual responses that support the auditor’s independent evaluation rather than attempting to direct its conclusions.
Corrective action and continued improvement
Help management respond to exceptions, understand causes and assign corrective actions. Follow up on whether revised controls are operating, update documentation after changes and maintain recurring review responsibilities. Keep the program functioning after examination through evidence checks, owner support and periodic reassessment of risks, vendors and service commitments.